A Winning Usability Design Approach for Medical Product FDA Submissions

 In User Insights & Design Research

There is a good chance that your medical device development team isn’t fully considering the needs of your clients while making key design decisions. While all the obvious information may be neatly organized in a product requirements document supporting your FDA submission, there’s more to it than that.

The team needs to understand how and why its requirements were chosen, and this presupposes prior thorough analysis of all the details that contribute to the experience a person is going to have with your product.

Clients ask us all the time for tips on how to better organize their usability design efforts.

With one client, we discovered that most of the information that impacted usability was not in one place and therefore hard to find.  It was tucked away in virtual files and worse yet, a report sitting on an office shelf.

Another client asked us to become involved too late in the device development process. We discovered evidence of a lack of rigor in ascertaining user needs, with unfortunate consequences.

Both companies had protocols in place, as does yours. Unfortunately, their development teams didn’t know about them or considered them within the context of a perfunctory checking of FDA regulatory boxes.

Your Usability Engineering File

The FDA-required Usability Engineering File contains all of the use-case, user needs, and user testing data for your medical product development project.  Actually it isn’t a “file” at all, which leads to misunderstandings.  It’s a table of contents that points to all the usability information required for your project.

The human factors group at a company should be responsible for the Usability Engineering File including all contents.  Unfortunately most medical device companies, especially start-ups, don’t have a dedicated in-house human factors team.  The responsibility usually defaults to the person in charge of FDA regulatory compliance.  Once that happens, there’s only a slight chance that your design team will reference it during early development.

I encourage you to review section 5 of the standard IEC 62366-1, Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices.  It explains the nine sections of your Usability Engineering File. Here are some tips for each:

1. Prepare use specification

State how your product will be used, by who, and under what conditions.  A robust user-centered design process will include exhaustive field research to uncover user needs.

2. Identify user interface characteristics related to safety and potential use errors

You are designing a medical device to be used by specific people in a specific way.  It’s your obligation to make sure it can be used safely by identifying potential use errors before they happen.  A task analysis of the use-scenarios is a great way to flush them out.

3. Identify known or foreseeable hazards and hazardous situations

Once the potential use errors are identified, you need to describe the effects they might have and how they might harm someone. Team brainstorming on how someone might misuse or be injured by your device can actually lead to new breakthroughs.

4. Identify and describe hazard-related scenarios

Combining the intended use-scenarios with the potential errors you identified will result in potential hazard-related scenarios. Learning what’s likely to go wrong will allow your design team to design around such hazards.

5. Select hazard-related scenarios for summative testing

You can test all or just some of the hazard-related scenarios during summative testing.  It depends on how much risk your company is willing to assume.

A common mistake is selecting scenarios too late in the design process to be useful to your development team.  It’s an easy mistake to make because summative testing doesn’t happen until development is about 90% complete.

We recommend identifying hazard-related scenarios on day one of your project.  Make sure they are in plain sight and your design team can eliminate them early.

6. Establish a user interface specification

A user interface specification contains all the user interface requirements and all the ways in which people will interact with your device.  It builds off the previous three sections we just discussed.  One tip is to make the requirements as specific and measurable as you can because they will need to be tested.

7. Establish a user interface evaluation plan

Formative and summative user interface evaluations should be included in your master project schedule on day one.  In our experience, they’re usually missing or sufficient time and resources are not allocated.

Knowing early on what will be evaluated over the course of a project will allow your design team to plan their tasks better.

For example, many interface evaluations require some type of prototype to be provided by the technical team.  The time and resources required to make one or possibly more prototypes needs to be planned well in advance.

8. Formative testing

User evaluations of your team’s assumptions, concepts, and prototypes should be performed early and often.  They are the holy grail of user feedback and promote intimate collaboration between your design team and users.  When conducted properly, they will give your development team the feedback needed to deliver a great user experience.

9. Summative testing

Remember the hazard-related scenarios identified in step five above?  The purpose of summative testing is to make sure a person can operate your device safely in those specific scenarios.  The FDA expects you to test about 15 primary users under very specific conditions.  Keep in mind that if both doctors and nurses are considered primary users, you’ll need to conduct testing with 30 people (15 doctors + 15 nurses).

Summing it all up

Your Usability Engineering File is the best way to organize your human factors design effort.  You already have to do it, so following our advice will make it more effective.

Make sure an expert in human factors takes ownership of it at the beginning of the development process.  Waiting for your regulatory team to address it is too late.  Consider it a tool to be used and referenced throughout your product design and development process.

If you’re like most medical device companies, your team is heavily staffed with technically-minded engineers, right?  You probably don’t have a fulltime expert in human factors at your disposal.

If so, we can help. Contact us to discuss your user needs’ challenges and learn more about how we can help deliver to your customers a great user experience.


Recent Posts